Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in France

UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) in France in Europe

Note: For information on the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in general, see here.

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: Related with French Cases

Cour de Cassation = CASS.= Supreme Court

CASS. 4 January 1995, 92-16.993 (Fauba v. Fujitsu Microelectronik). Arts. 19, 86(1),

– 1st instance Tribunal com. de Paris (No. 31859) 6 November 1991 [CISG overlooked]

– 2d instance CA Paris 22 April 1992 [affirmed]

CASS. 23 January 1996, 173 P 93-16.542 (Savocini/Marazza v. Sté les fils de Henri Ramel/Sté Bonfils Georges/Sté Preau et compagnie). Arts. 25, 35, 46, 49,

Р1st instance Trib. com. S̬te 4 June 1991 [affirmed] [CISG overlooked]

– 2d instance CA Montpellier 15 April 1993 [affirmed] [CISG overlooked]

CASS. 17 December 1996, Y95-20.273 (Sté Ceramique Culinaire de France v. Musgrave Ltd.). Arts. 1(1)(a), 1(1)(b), 6, 35(2)(a),

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grande Instance de Strasbourg 17 November 1993

– 2d instance CA Colmar 26 September 1995 [reversed]

CASS. 2 December 1997, 95-20.809 (SA Mode jeune diffusion v. SNC Maglificio il Falco die Tiziana Goti e Fabio Goti et al). Arts. 1(1)(a), 31,

– 1st instance Tribunal com. Roubaix-Tourcoing

– 2d instance CA Douai 14 September 1995 [affirmed]

CASS. 27 January 1998, B 95-19.448 (Hughes v. Sté Technocontract). Arts. 18, 49,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Versailles 6 November 1991 [affirmed in part]

– 2d instance CA Versailles 19 April 1995 [affirmed]

CASS. 16 July 1998, 96-11.984 (Les Verreries de Saint Gobain, SA v. Martinswerk GmbH). Arts. 18, 19,

– 1st instance [-]

Р2d instance CA Orl̩ans 3 January 1996

CASS. 5 January 1999. P 96-19.992 (Thermo King v. Cigna Insurance Company of Europe SA-NV; Transports Norbert Dentressangle SA Societé Frappa SA; Societé Sorhofroid SARL). Arts. 1, 4, 36,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Vienne 12 October 1992 [CISG not applied]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Grenoble 15 May 1996 [reversed]

CASS. 26 May 1999. 97-14.315 (Société Karl Schreiber GmbH v. Société Thermo Dynamique Service et autres). Arts. 38, 39, 46, 49, 81,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Toulon 27 July 1994 [reversed]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel d’Aix-en-Provence 21 November 1996 [reversal affirmed]

CASS. 26 June 2001, E 99-14.844 (Société Anton Huber GmbH & Co. KG v. SA Polyspace). Arts. 1(1)(b), 31,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Nantes

– 2d instance Cour d’appel d’Angers

CASS. 26 June 2001, Q 99-16.118 (Société Muller Ecole et Bureau v. Société Federal Trait). Arts. 1(1)(b), 6,

– 1st instance Tribunal d’Instance de Paris 14 February 1996

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Colmar 23 February 1999

CASS. 26 June 2001, T-99-18.582 (Société Ogasa destribuciones v. Société Madrange). Art. 57,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Limoges

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Limoges 1 July 1999

CASS. 2 October 2001, B 99-13.461 (Société Lombard et al. v. Cofranca Import Export Inc.) Arts. 1, 2(a), 35,

– 1st instance [ – ]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 10 February 1999 [remanded]

CASS. 8 January 2002, Y 00-13.453 (Société Coq’in v. Société Polarcup Bénélux BV). Art. 35,

– [ – ]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Grenoble 19 January 2000

CASS. 19 March 2002, T 00-14.414, Arrêt no. 526 F-P. Arts. 7(1), 8, 42(2)(a),

– 1st instance [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Rouen 17 February 2000 [affirmed]

CASS. 20 May 2003, 00-22468 (Data processing equipment case). Arts. 30, 31,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 18 March 1999 [affirmed]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 12 October 2000 [affirmed]

CASS. 25 November 2003, 01-12830 (Boots case) [Rejection of Appeal]. Art. 30,

CASS. 24 September 2003, 1312FS-P (Aluminum and Light Company v. Saint Bernard Miroiterie Vitrerie). Arts. 7(2), 35, 36,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 10 May 2000

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 14 June 2001

CASS. 11 February 2004, 01-16736. Art. 74,

CASS. 30 June 2004, Y 01-15.15.964 (Société Romay AG v. SARL Behr France). Arts. 2, 3, 7, 8, 30, 74, 77, 79,

– 1st instance Tribunal de grand instance de Colmar 18 December 1997

– 2d instance Cour d’appel Colmar 12 June 2001

CASS. 4 October 2005, 02-15.981. Arts. 35, 38, 39, 40,

– 1st instance [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Lyon 19 November 2000 [affirmed]

CASS. 25 October 2005, U 99-12.879 (Weed killer case). Art. 6,

– 1st instance [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Rennes [affirmed]

CASS. 28 February 2006, 02-20248 et 02-20206 (Horse meat case). Arts. 1(1), 5, 36,

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 18 June 2002 [affirmed]

CASS. 13 February 2007 (Computer motherboard case). Art. 4,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny 11 September 2003 [reversed]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 25 February 2005 [reversed and remanded]

– 4th instance Cour d’appel de Paris 7 October 2009

CASS. 13 February 2007 (Société S… TC (K… L…) v. Société Ge…). Arts. 4, 7, 8, 39, 45, 74, 77, 81(2),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Lyon 16 March 2001

– 2d instance Court d’appel de Lyon 18 December 2003

CASS. 20 February 2007 (Perfume case). Art. 71,

– 1st instance [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Versailles 19 February 2004 [reversed]

CASS. 2 April 2008 (Telecommunications products case). Art. 93,

– Earlier instance Aix-en-Provence 1 April 2004

CASS. 16 September 2008 (Potato seedlings case). Arts. 38, 39, 40,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grande Instance de Rouen 13 July 2005

– 2d instance Cour d’appel Rouen 19 December 2006 [affirmed]

CASS. 3 February 2009 [07-21827] (Société Novodec / Société Sigmakalon v. Sociétés Mobacc et Sam 7). Arts. 39, 40,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce d’Amiens 3 November 1997

– 2d instance Cour d’appel d’Amiens 27 September 2007

CASS. 8 April 2009, 08-10678 (Société Bati-Seul v. Société Ceramiche Marca Corona). Arts. 8, 35, 38, 39,

– 1st instance Tribunal d’instance de Villeneuve-sur-Lot 29 July 2005

– 2d instance Cour d’appel d’Agen 3 September 2007 [reversed]

CASS. 3 November 2009, T 08-12.399 (Société Anthon GmbH & Co. v. SA Tonnellerie Ludonnaise). Arts. 6, 82,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bordeaux (R.G. 2002 F159) 28 April 2003

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Bordeaux 15 October 2007 [reversed]

CASS. 11 May 2010, 08-21266 (Ultimate Solution Company contre Union International Oil and Gaz Material Pictures). Arts. 45, 74, 81, 84,

CASS. 1 December 2010, 09-13303 (Catamaran case). Arts. 2(a), 2(e), 74,

CASS. 8 February 2011 [-] (Christmas tree case). Arts. 35, 39,

– Cour d’appel de Riom 29 April 2009;

– Court Court of Appeal of Lyon 18 October 2012

CASS. 22 March 2011, 10-16993 (Société Galperti Tech et a. contre Société RKS). Art. 1(1)(b),

CASS. 27 April 2011, 09-13524 (Crédit Lyonnais v. Telecom Italia). Arts. [-],

– 1st instance Court of Appeal of Paris 12 February 2009

CASS. 13 September 2011 Supreme Court (Cybernetix v. CD Systems). Arts. 6, 7, 8, 25, 49, 50, 51, 72, 80,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de marseilles, 15 May 2006

– 2d instance Cour d’appel d’Aix-en-provence, 7 May 2009

CASS. 8 November 2011, 10-24691 (Press Brakes case). Arts. 25, 26, 39, 49, 80,

CASS. 7 February 2012, 10-30912 (Ecofrut v. Dole France). Arts. 11, 23, 29, 61,

– 1st instance [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Douai, May 20, 2010

CASS. 27 November 2012, 11-14588 (Cooktops Case). Art. 39,

CASS. 27 November 2012, 11-24358 (Machine manufacturing staves case). Arts. 39, 45, 82(1), 82(2), 74,

– 1st instance Cour d’appel de Bordeaux, 27 June 2011

CASS. 13 February 2013, 10-24850 (Bags case). Arts. 7(2), 35, 36, 39,

CASS. 26 March 2013, 11-26971 (Stair making machinery case). Art. 35, 49,

– 1st instance Agen 19 September 2011

CASS. 17 December 2013, 12-23998 (Socinter v. Wallace). Arts. 25, 35, 36, 49,

– 1st instance Cour d’appel de Paris 25 janvier 2012

CASS. 27 May 2014, 12-27188 (Paving stones case). Arts. 1, 19, 35,

-2d instance Cour d’appel de Rennes 9 May 2012

CASS. 4 November 2014, 13-10776 (Christmas Tree case). Arts. 38, 39, 40, 74,

– 2d instance CA Lyon 18 October 2012

CASS. 17 February 2015, 12-29550, 13-18956, 13.20230. Arts. 7, 8, 9, 11, 25, 74,

CASS. 17 February 2015, 13-22986 (Manitowoc Crane Group France v. Commercio Materie Prime SPA). Art. 38 ; 39,
Agen

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Agen 5 September 2007 (Société Bati-Seul v. Société Ceramiche Marca Corona). Arts. 32, 39,

– 1st instance Tribunal d’instance de Villeneuve-sur-lot 29 July 2005

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 8 April 2009 [reversing]

CA Agen 19 September 2011, 10/01571 (Stairs case). Arts. 35, 49,

– Tribunal de commerce d’Agen 5 May 2010;

– Cour de cassation, 26 March 2013
Aix-en-Provence

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Aix-en-Provence 21 November 1996, 94118531 (Société Karl Schreiber GmbH v. Société Thermo Dynamique Service et autres). Arts. 38, 39, 74, 81, 84(1),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Toulon 27 July 1994 [reversed]

– 3d instance Cour de Cassation 26 May 1999 [affirming reversal]

CA Aix-en-Provence 1 July 2005, 03/05302 (Footware case). Arts. 38(1), 39(1),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce d’Aix-en-Provence 7 January 2003 [reversed]

CA Aix-en-Provence 7 May 2009, 06/16296 (SA CD Systems de Columbia contre SA Cybernetix). Arts 6, 7, 8(3), 25, 30, 49, 50, 51(2), 53, 72, 80,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de marseilles, 15 May 2006

– 3d instance Cour de cassation, chamber commercial, 13 September 2011

CA Aix-en-Provence 24 May 2012, 10/20457 (Citrus case). Arts. 9, 35, 39, 50,

– Decision referred Commercial Court of Marseille 30 September 2010

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. Aix-en-Provence 7 January 2003, 02 005972 (Footware case). Art. 35,

– 2d instance Cour d’appel Aix-en-Provence 1 July 2005 [reversing]
Amiens

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Amiens 30 January 2001, RG 99102272 (Vanderlinden v. S.A. Vergers de Seru). Arts. 1, 6, 100,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Commerce de Saint Quentin 25 January 1999

CA Amiens 27 September 2007, RG 98/00063 (Société Novodec / Société Sigmakalon v. Sociétés Mobacc et Sam 7). Art. 39,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce d’Amiens 3 November 1997

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 3 February 2009
Arbitration

Arbitration Chamber of Paris Case No. 9926 of 2007 [assumed date] (Chemical compound case). Arts. 4, 35, 36, 74, [English text]
Besançon

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. Besançon 19 January 1998, 97 009265 (Flippe Christian v. SARL Dout Sport Collections). Arts. 35, 36, 39, 49, 74, 79,
Bobigny

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. Bobigny 19 September 2002, 2002F00070 (Pressure cookers case). Art. [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 04 June 2004
Bordeaux

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Bordeaux 28 June 2004, 03/02869 (Société Anthon GmbH & Co. v. SA Tonnellerie Ludonnais). Art. [-]

– 1st instance Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (R.G. 2002 F15a) 28 April 2003 [reversed]

– 3d instance Cour d’appel de Bordeaux 15 October 2007 [reversed]

– 4th instance Cour de cassation 3 November 2009

CA Bordeaux 15 October 2007 (Société Anthon GmbH v. SA Tonnellerie Ludonnais). Articles [-]

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bordeaux (R.G. 2002 F159) 28 April 2003

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 3 November 2009 [reversing]

CA Bordeaux 27 June 2011, 09/07056 (Stave making machine case). Arts. 6, 35, 36, 38, 39, 45, 49, 74, 75, 76, 77, 82,

– Decision referred Commercial Court of Bordeaux 28 April 2003

– On remand by Supreme Court November 3, 2009

CA Bordeaux 12 September 2013, 12/01065 (Tiles case). Arts. 7 ,35, 36, 38, 39, 40,

– High Court of Bordeaux 24 January 2012

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. Bordeaux 28 April 2003, 2002F00159 (Société Anthon GmbH & Co. v. SA Tonnellerie Ludonnais). Art. [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Bordeaux 28 June 2004

– 3d instance Cour d’appel de Bordeaux 15 October 2007 [reversed]

– 4th instance Cour de cassation 3 November 2009
Chambéry

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Chambéry 25 May 1993, 93-648 (Société A.M.D. Electronique v. Rosenberger SIAM S.p.A.). Art. 3(1),

– 1st instance Regional Court of Bonneville 6 January 1993 [affirmed]

Colmar

Cour d’appel = CA – Appeal Court

CA Colmar 26 September 1995, 94-00488 (Sté Ceramique Culinaire de France v. Musgrave Ltd.). Arts. 1(1)(a), 1(1)(b), 6,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grande Instance de Strasbourg 17 November 1993

– 3d instance CASS. 17 December 1996 [reversing]

CA Colmar 23 February 1999, 1A 9601815, (Sté M… Ecole et Bureau v. Sté F… T…). Art. [-]

CA Colmar 24 October 2000, [-] (S.a.r.l. Pelliculest / A.A. Rhin et Moselle Assurances v. G.m.b.H. Morton International / Société Zurich Assurances). Arts. 10, 35, 36, 39(1), 46, 95,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grand Instance de Strassbourg 28 March 1996

CA Colmar 12 June 2001, 1 A 199800359 (Sté R…AG v. SARL B… France). Arts. 2, 3, 7, 30, 53, 61, 74, 77, 79,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grand Instance de Colmar 18 December 1997

– 3d instance Cour de Cassation 30 June 2004

CA Colmar 13 November 2002, [-]. Arts. 42, 43, 44,

CA Colmar 26 February 2008 (Printed products case). Art. 3,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grand Instance de Strasbourg 26 July 2007 [reversed]

CA Colmar 27 August 2008, 1 B 05/01683 (Plastic granulate case). Arts. 39, 49, 74,

CA Colmar 23 November 2010, 1 A 09/03661 (Induction Cooktops). Arts. 7, 38, 39,

– Decision referred from Court of First Instance, Strasbourg 25 June 2009

– Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court] Commercial Chamber 27 November 2012

CA Colmar 6 November 2013, 1 A 11/03748 (Pavers). Arts. 7, 9,

– High Court commercial competence Strasbourg 28 March 2011

CA Colmar 22 January 2014, 1 A 13/02580 (Washers contact case). Art. 39,

– High Court commercial competence Strasbourg 2 May 2013
Tribunal de grande instance = Tr. gr. = District Court

Tr. Gr. Colmar 18 December 1997, [-] (Société Romay AG v. Société Behr France SARL). Arts. 3, 7, 30, 53, 74, 79,
Corbeil

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. 25 October 1996, 1996/00889. Art. 53,

– 2d instance CA Paris 21 May 1999 [affirmed]
Douai

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Douai 20 May 2010, 08/03762 (Press brakes case). Arts. 25, 26, 39, 49, 74,

– Tribunal de commerce d’Arras 16 May 2008;

– Cour de cassation 8 November 2011

CA Douai 6 February 2014, 11/08248 (Press brakes case). Arts. 1, 25, 39, 45, 49, 82,

-1st instance Tribunal de Commerce d’Arras 16 May 2008

-2d instance Cour d’Appel de Douai 20 May 2010, 3rd Instance Cour de Cassation 8 November 2011
Grenoble

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Grenoble 16 June 1993, 92/4223 (S.A.R.L. Ytong v. Angel Lasaosa). Arts. 1(1)(b), 8, 57(1)(a),

– 1st instance Court of Bourgoin-Jallieu 15 July 1992 [reversed]

CA Grenoble 22 February 1995, 93/3275 (SARL Bri Production “Bonaventure” v. Société Pan African Export). Arts. 1(1)(a), 7, 8(1), 25, 61, 64, 73(2),

– 1st instance Trib. com. Grenoble (No. 134007) 14 May 1993 [CISG overlooked] [reversed]

CA Grenoble 29 March 1995, 93/2821 [156] (Société Cámara Agraria Provincial de Guipuzcoa v. André Margaron). Arts. 1(1)(a), 29, 31(a), 31(c), 57(1), 78,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grande Instance de Grenoble 11 March 1993 [CISG overlooked] [reversed in part]

CA Grenoble 26 April 1995, 93/1613 [213] (Veyron v. Ambrosio). Arts. 6, 8(2), 8(3), 14, 55,

– 1st instance Trib. com. Grenoble (No. 346004) 11 December 1992 [CISG overlooked] [affirmed in part]

CA Grenoble 26 April 1995, 93/4879 (Marques Roque Joachim v. La Sarl Holding Manin Rivière). Arts. 1(1)(b), 3(2), 25, 35(2)(b), 46(3), 48(1), 49, 78,

– 1st instance Trib. com. Grenoble (No. 254010) 11 September 1991 [affirmed in part]

CA Grenoble 13 September 1995, 93/4126 (Caiato v. SA S.F.F.). Arts. 4, 6, 7(2), 8(1), 9, 35, 39,

– 1st instance Trib. com. Grenoble (No. 190053) 9 July 1993 [reversed]

CA Grenoble 11 January 1996, 93/0713 (Ram Dis v. Tortel). Art. 1(1)(a),

CA Grenoble 15 May 1996, 94/0258 (Thermo King v. Cigna Insurance Company of Europe SA-NV; Transports Norbert Dentressangle SA; Société Frappa SA; Société Sorhofroid SARL). Arts. 1(1), 4, 35(2)(a), 36(2),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Vienne 12 October 1993 [CISG not applied]

– 3d instance Cour de Cassation 5 January 1999

CA Grenoble 23 October 1996, 94/3859 (Scea. Gaec des Beauches B. Bruno v. Société Teso ten Elsen). Arts. 1(1)(b), 4, 7(2), 8, 57(1), 74, [UNIDROIT Principles Art. 6.1.6 also cited]

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grande Instance Valence 19 April 1994 [affirmed]

CA Grenoble 4 February 1999, RG 98/0270 (appeal of decision RG 97008146) (SARL Ego Fruits v. Sté La Verja Begasti). Arts. 25, 63, 64, 74,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Romans 22 April 1998 [reversed]

CA Grenoble 21 October 1999, [-] (Sté Calzados Magnanni v. SARL Shoes International) . Arts. 3(1), 8, 9(1), 18, 25, 49, 74, 84,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Vienne (RG 96J/00101) 10 June 1997

CA Grenoble 28 November 2002, [-]. Arts. 11, 74, 78

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce (RG OOJ01373) 26 January 2001

CA Grenoble 26 September 2013, 2012J254 (Wooden shoe trees case). Art. [-]

– Commercial Court Romans 13 March 2013
Limoges

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Limoges 1 July 1999, 99-18582 (Ogasa destribuciones v. Madrange). Art. 57

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Limoges

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 26 June 2001

CA Limoges 21 March 2013, 10/00477 (Amphibious excavator case). Arts. 27, 39,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Limoges 17 March 2010
Louviers

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. 26 June 1997 (Societe MA…R.A.S v. SAT… Diffusion ). Arts. [-]

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Rouen, 17 February 2000
Lyon

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Lyon 18 December 2003, [-] (Coin change machine case). Arts. 3, 35, 39(2), 47,

– 1st instance Tribunale de commerce de Lyon 16 March 2001

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 13 February 2007

CA Lyon 18 September 2008, 07/03304 (Vehicles case). Arts. 45, 74, 81, 84,

CA Lyon 12 January 2010, 08/08864 (Bags case). Arts. 36, 39,

– Decision referred Commercial Court of Bourg-en-Bresse December 5, 2008

– Court Court of Appeal of Lyon June 22, 2010

– Court of Cassation [Supreme court] 13 February 2013

CA Lyon 22 June 2010, 08/08864 (Bags case). Arts. 7, 35, 36, 39,

– Referred from Tribunal de commerce de Bourg-en-Bresse 5 December 2008

– On referral Court of Appeal of Lyon, 12 January 2010

– Court of Cassation [Supreme court] 13 February 2013

CA Lyon 18 October 2012, 11/01896 (Christmas tree case). Arts. 38, 39, 40, 77,

CA Lyon 27 March 2014, 11/08237 (Rails case). Arts. 1, 35, 79,

-1st instance Tribunal de Commerce de Lyon 12 September 2011
Montargis

Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. 6 October 2000, [-] (Société TCE Diffusion S.a.r.l. v. Société Elettrotecnica Ricci). Art. 31,

– 2d instance Cour d’appel d’Orléans 29 March 2001 [affirmed in part]
Nancy

CA Nancy 6 November 2013, 0/03154 (Tractor case). Arts. 4, 25, 33, 34, 49,

– Commercial Court of Nancy 24 July 2010
Orléans

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Orléans 29 March 2001, No. 614; RG:00/02900 (Société TCE Diffusion S.a.r.l. v. Société Eletrrotecnica Ricci). Art. 31,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Montargis 6 October 2000 [affirmed in part]
Paris

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Paris 22 April 1992, 92-000863 (Fauba v. Fujitsu Microelectronik). Arts. 4(a), 19(2), 23,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris (No. 31859) 6 November 1991 [CISG not mentioned]

– 3d instance CASS. 4 January 1995 [affirming]

CA Paris 10 November 1993, No. 9 (Société Lorraine des Produits Metallurgiques v. Banque Paribas Belgique S.A.). Art. 57(1)(a),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny 11 March 1993 [partly reversed]

CA Paris 6 April 1995, [-] (Societé Thyssen Stahlunion c. Maaden General Foreign Trade Organisation For Metal & Building Materials). Arts. 9, 78, 84,

– 1st instance ICC Arbitration Case No. 6653 of 26 March 1993 [affirmed in part, reversed in part]

CA Paris 13 December 1995, 95-019179 (ISEA Industrie S.p.A. / Compagnie d’Assurances General v. Lu S.A. et al.). Arts. 4, 18(2), 19, 23, 35, 36,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 8 June 1995 [reversed]

CA Paris 26 September 1996, [-] (Sté Atlas Halicilik Islemtmesi v. SA Alecto et al.). Art. 6,

CA Paris 15 October 1997, [-] (SARL Sodime-La Rosa v. Sté Softlife design Ltd. et autre). Arts. 6, 57(a),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 7 January 1997

CA Paris 14 January 1998, 97/17127 (Societé Productions v. Roberto Faggioni). Arts. 1(1)(a), 7(1), 7(2), 57(1), 82(1), 84(1),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris (97/08783) 8 July 1997 [affirmed]

CA Paris 4 March 1998, 97/24418 (Societé Laborall v. SA Matis) Arts. 30, 31, 35, 36, 45,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 28 October 1997 [reversed]

CA Paris 18 March 1998, 1997/25212 (Franco-africaine v. More). Arts. 31, 35, 45, 50, 51,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Montereau 4 November 1997 [affirmed]

CA Paris 10 February 1999, [-] (Sociétés L… et C… v. Boucherie D… et autres). Arts. 4, 35(1),

– 1st instance Tribunal d’Instance de Paris 14 February 1996

– 3d instance Cour de Cassation 2 October 2001 [remanding]

CA Paris 21 May 1999, 1998/03462 (SA JCP Industrie v. Société Aris Antrieb und Steuerungen GmbH). Arts. [-]

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Corbeil 25 October 1996 [affirmed]

CA Paris 12 October 2000, 1998/025917 (Data processing equipment case). Arts. 9, 25, 30, 53, 62,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 18 March 1999 (affirmed)

CA Paris 26 October 2000, 1999/09403 (Société H.L.E. (Livestock Exports Ltd) v. S.a.r.l. Soviam). Art. 57,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Meaux (1998/00113) 19 January 1999

CA Paris 14 June 2001, R.G no. 1998/38724 (Aluminum and Light Company v. Saint Bernard Miroiterie Vitrerie). Arts. 3(2), 35, 47(1), 49,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris 10 May 2000 [affirmed]

– 3d instance Cour de Cassation 24 September 2003

CA Paris 6 November 2001, 2000/04607 (Traction Levage SA v. Drahtseilerei). Arts. 4, 6, 7, 12, 38, 39,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris (RG no. 1996/74776) 30 September 1999

CA Paris 18 June 2002, 2000/22873 (Horse meat case). Arts. 1, 5, 36,

CA Paris 10 September 2003, 2002/02304, Arts. 4, 8, 9(2), 14(1), 15, 18,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris (1999/75600) 13 September 2001 [affirmed]

CA Paris 19 September 2003, [-] (Société Virgin CH… Ltd v. SA Agrana Z… Aktiengesellschaft). Art. 39,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris (2002/21966) 18 September 2002 [affirmed]

CA Paris 4 June 2004, 2002/18702 (SARL NE… v. SAA AMI… et SA Les Comptoirs M…). Arts. 25, 35, 49,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny (RG 2002/00070) 19 September 2002

CA Paris 4 November 2004, 2003/21489 (Kiwi case). Arts. 38, 53,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Paris (1994/83479) 19 March 1999 [affirmed]

CA Paris 25 February 2005, 2002/200832 (Société S… v. S.A. DIG…). Arts. 35, 36, 39, 40,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny 11 September 2003

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 13 February 2007 [reversing and remanding]

CA Paris 11 October 2007, 07/01353 (Société M. v. Société PTR Inc). Arts. [-]

CA Paris 4 March 2009, 06/20110 (Recycled Plastic case). Arts. 38, 39, 40,

– 1st instance Arbitral award 21 April 2005

CA Paris 7 October 2009 (Computer motherboard case). Arts. 4, 7, 8, 18, 25, 29, 35, 36, 39, 40, 45, 74,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny 11 September 2003

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 25 February 2005

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 13 February 2007 [reversing and remanding]

CA Paris 12 February 2009, 07/07675 (Network terminals case). Arts. [-]

– On referral from Cour de cassation 19 December 2006

– Court of Cassation [Supreme Court] 27 April 2011

CA Paris 18 November 2009, 08/07829 (Almonds case). Art. 14,

CA Paris 2 December 2009, 08/05688 (Defective Cosmetics case). Arts. 38, 39,

CA Paris 18 March 2010, 09/24485. Art. 31,

– Decision referred from Tribunal de commerce d’Auxerre 2 November 2009

CA Paris 10 May 2010, 3089 (Frozen fish). Arts. 1, 18, 19, 36,

– Cour de cassation [Supreme court] 22 March 2011

CA Paris 12 May 2010, 07/16459 (Pears case). Arts. 11, 29,

РDecision referred from Tribunal de commerce de Cr̩teil, 18 September 2007

– Cour de cassation [Supreme court] 7 February 2012

CA Paris 24 October 2013, 11/10269 (Fireplaces case). Art. [-]

– Commercial Court of Bobigny 26 January 2010

CA Paris 10 April 2014, 12/04644 (Oil goods case). Art. [-]

– Commercial Court of Paris 31 January 2012
Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. de com. Paris 28 October 1997, 97/007782 (SA Matis v. Societé Laborall). Arts. 31, 35,

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Paris 4 March 1998 [reversing]

CA Paris 19 November 2010 (Makeup chairs case). Art. 31,
Poitiers

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Poitiers 26 October 2004, [-]. Arts. 33, 38, 39, 46, 47(1) 74, 78,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de la Roche sur Yon 6 November 2001 [affirmed]

CA Poitiers 26 February 2009 (Ship sailing catamaran case). Art. 74,
Tribunal de commerce = Tr. com. = District Court

Tr. com. Poitiers 9 December 1996, 509/96 (Hundsbicher KG v. Sté Boyauderie du Poitou). Arts. 1(1)(a), 25,
Reims

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Reims 30 April 2013, 11/01950 (Light chains case). Arts. 3, 35, 36, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52

– Decision referred from Tribunal de commerce de Troyes 14 March 2011
Rennes

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Rennes 18 December 1998, [-]. Arts. [-]

CA Rennes 27 May 2008 (Brassiere cups case). Arts. 18, 19, 23, 26, 35, 39, 45, 47, 49, 74, 75, 77,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Rennes 21 December 2006 [reversed]

CA Rennes 7 January 2014, 12/03645 (Machine case). Art. 39,

– Commercial Court of Saint-Brieuc 23 April 2012
Riom

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Riom 29 April 2009, 08/01643 (Christmas tree case). Art. [-]

– Tribunal de commerce d’Aurillac, 17 June 2008 [reversed]

– Cour de Cassation 8 February 2011 [reversed]

– Cour d’appel de Lyon 18 October 2012

CA Riom 25 September 2013, 12/02296. Art. 31,

– Commercial Court of Aurillac 18 February 2002
Rouen

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Rouen 17 February 2000, [-] (Sté Ma… R.A.S. v. S.A. T… Diffusion). Art. 42,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Louviers 26 June 1997

CA Rouen 19 December 2006 (Potato seedlings case). Arts. 4, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40,

– 1st instance Tribunal de Grande Instance de Rouen 13 July 2005

– 3d instance Cour de cassation 18 September 2008 [affirming]

CA Rouen 26 September 2013, 11/04939 (Glue case). Art. 39,

– Commercial court of Rouen 5 September 2011

CA Rouen 3 October 2013, 12/02078 (Film rolls polypropylenes case). Arts. 6, 26, 35, 70, 74, 80,

– Commercial Court in Dieppe 3 February 2012
Strasbourg

Tribunal de grande instance = Tr. gr. = District Court

Tr. gr. 22 December 2006 Tribunal de Grande Instance [District Court] (Cathode ray tube case). Arts. 8, 23, 54, 63, 64, 74, 78,
Toulouse

CA Toulouse 18 March 2014, 12/03618 (Sweater case). Arts. 1, 35, 36, 39, 74,

– Commercial Court in Castres 25 June 2012
Versailles

Cour d’appel = CA = Appeal Court

CA Versailles 19 April 1995, Arret No. 208; RG 2491/92 (Societé Hughes Electronic v. SA Souriau Cluses). Art. 48,

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Versailles 6 November 1991 [affirmed in part]

– 3d instance Cour de Cassation 27 January 1998 [affirming]

CA Versailles 29 January 1998, Arrêt no. 56; RG 1222/95 (Société Giustina International v. Société Perfect Circle Europe). Arts 39, 46, 47, 49,

– 1st instance Trib. com. Versailles 23 November 1994 [affirmed]

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Pontoise

CA Versailles 27 June 2002, [-] (Sté A… S… v. SARL Me… et SARL Qu…). Art. 1(1)(b),

– 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Versailles 26 January 2000 [reversed]

CA Versailles 28 November 2002, [-] (SARL B… C… v. SARL T… Diff et Sté E…), Arts. 31, 78,

CA Versailles 19 February 2004, 03/04706 (Perfume case). Arts. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 71, 73,

CA Versailles 13 October 2005, [-]. Arts. 4, 7(2), 35, 39, 74,

CA Versailles 11 February 2014, 12/06466 (Vegetable case). Art. [-]

– Commercial Court in Chartres 24 July 2012

CA Versailles 13 May 2014, 12/05594 (Copper cable case). Arts. 1, 73,

-1st instance Tribunal de Commerce de Nanterre 3 July 2012
Tribunal de commerce = Tr. de com. = District Court

Tr. de com. Versailles 26 January 2000, [97F02317] (SARL Me… contre Societe A…M…S… Holland BV et Societe A…M…S…Ltd ). Art. 42,

– 2d instance Cour d’appel de Versailles, 27 June 2002

Tr. de com. Versailles 12 March 2010 (Medical electronic equipment case). Arts. 53, 64, 74, 78,
Tribunal de grande instance = Tr = District Court

Tr Versailles 23 November 2004, [-]. Art. 42,

Leave a Comment