{"id":19639,"date":"2013-04-02T13:23:11","date_gmt":"2013-04-02T13:23:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/legaldictionary.lawin.org?p=10901"},"modified":"2013-04-02T13:23:11","modified_gmt":"2013-04-02T13:23:11","slug":"soott-v-tyler-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/soott-v-tyler-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Soott V. Tyler"},"content":{"rendered":"
((1788), 2 Bro. Ch. 431). A legacy had been given to a daughter, one moiety of which was to be paid to her at twenty-one if then unmarried, and the other moiety at twenty-five if then unmarried ; but in case she married before twenty-one with the consent of her mother, to be settled upon her as mentioned in the will. The daughter married under twenty-one without the consent of her mother. Held, that the legacy did not vest in the daughter upon the marriage, and that she never came under the description to which the gift of the legacy was attached<\/p>\n<\/h4>\n
You might be interested in these references tools:<\/p>\n