{"id":5866,"date":"2012-12-26T14:24:46","date_gmt":"2012-12-26T14:24:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lawin.org\/?p=5866"},"modified":"2012-12-26T14:24:46","modified_gmt":"2012-12-26T14:24:46","slug":"abandon-historic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/abandon-historic\/","title":{"rendered":"Abandon, Historical"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Abandon and Abandonment, Historical in Europe<\/h1>\n<p><strong>Definition<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>To desert, to forsake. Abandonment is the relinquishment or surrender of rights or property by one person to another. In Hickman v. Link, 116 Mo. 123, and Dodge v. Marden, 7 Oregon 460; State V. Seneca County Bank, 5 Ohio St. 177, \u201cAbandonment is a word that has acquired a technical meaning. It is defined to be the relinquishment of a right\u2014the giving up of something to which we are entitled.&#8221; Mallett V. Uncle Sam Gold Min. Co., i Nev. 204.<\/li>\n<li>Property is said to be abandoned when it is thrown away, or its possession is voluntarily forsaken by the owner. Eads v. Brazelton, 22 Ajk. 509.<\/li>\n<li>It includes both the intention to abandon and the external act by which the intention is carried into effect. Hickman v. Link, 115 Mo. 123, Dodge v. Marden, 78 Oregon 460; Livermore v. White, 74 Me. 452; Clark v. Hammerle, 36 Mo. 62a; Moon v. Rollins, 36 Cal. 333; Keane v. Connovan, 21 Cal. 293; Wilson V. Daniels, 79 Iowa 132; Duffey v. Willis, 99 Mo. 132; Rowe v. Minneapolis, 49 Minn. 148; Kuschke v. St. Paul, 45 Minn. 225.<\/li>\n<li>This definition is covered also in \u201cThe mining reports. A series containing the cases on the law of mines found in the American and English reports, arranged alphabetically by subjects, with notes and references (1883)\u201d.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>As where an article is thrown away<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>M&#8217;Goon V. Ankeny, 11 111. 558. It may be inferred from mere lapse of time. Brentlinger V. Hutchinson, i Watts (Pa.) 46. See Smoot V. Wathen, 8 Mo. 522.<\/li>\n<li>Where the owner of a tannery sold it, but forgot to remove some hides which had been placed in the vats for tanning, and some years afterwards they were found, it was held that they were not abandoned. Livermore v. White, 74 Me. 452, 43 Am. Rep. 600.<\/li>\n<li>To constitute abandonment there must be the concurrence of the intention to abandon and the actual relinquishment of the property so that it may be appropriated by the next comer. Judson v. Malloy, 40 Cal. 299.<\/li>\n<li>&#8221; To constitute an abandonment of a right secured, there must be a clear, unequivocal, and decisive act of the party\u2014an act done which shows a determination in the individual not to have a benefit which is designed for him.&#8221; Breedlove v. Stump, 3 Yerg. (Tenn.) 257, quoted with approval in Dawson V. Daniel, 2 Flipp. (U. S.) 309.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Abandonment of aTrademark<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>To constitute abandonment of a trademark, an intention to abandon must be shown; mere evidence of nonuser is insufficient. Monson V. Boehm, 26 Ch. Div. 398.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Intent\u2014Questions of law and Fact.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As intent is the essence of abandonment, the facts of each particular case are for the jury. 2 Washb. Real Prop. (4th ed.) 370, 40 Am. Dec. 464, note; Dyer\u00bb. Sanford, 9Met. (Mass.)395; Clemmins v. Gottshall, 4 Yeates (Pa.) 330; Miller w. Cresson, 5 W. &amp; S. (Pa.) 284; Heath<br \/>\nV. Biddle, 9 Pa. St. 273; Wiggins v. McCleary, 49 N. Y. 346; Bell V. Smith, 2 Johns. (N. Y.)<br \/>\n98; Wilson V. Pearson, 20 111. 81; M&#8217;Goon v. Ankeny, 11 111. 558; Hazelbaker v. Goodfellow,<br \/>\n64 111. 238; Taylor v. Hampton, 4 McCord (S. Car.) 96; Parkins v. Dunham, 3 Strobh. (S. Car.) 224; Banks v. Banks, 77 N. Car. 186; Weill v. Lucerne Min. Co., 11 Nev. 200; Myers v. Spooner, 55 Cal. 257; Marquart v. Bradford, 43 Cal. 526; Smith v. Gushing, 41 Cal. 97; Bell v. Bed Rock Tunnel,<br \/>\netc., Co., 36 Cal. 214; Moon i\/. Rollins, 36 Cal. 333; Davis v. Perley, 30 Cal. 630; Roberts<br \/>\nV. Unger, 30 Cal.676; Masson p. Anderson, 3 Baxt. (Tenn.) 290; Landes v. Perkins, 12 Mo.<br \/>\n238. See also Sample v. Robb, 16 Pa. St. 305; Atchison v. McCuUoch, 5 Watts (Pa.)<br \/>\n13. See also Questions of Law and Fact.<\/p>\n<p><strong>See Also<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Abandon, Historical 2<\/li>\n<li>Abandon, Historical 3<\/li>\n<li>Adverse Posesion, Historical<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment of Canals. See Canals in Law.<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment of Condemnation Proceedings. See Eminent Domain.<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment of a Contract. See Contracts, Historical.<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment of a Fixture. See Fixtures in Law.<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment of a Highway. See Highways in Law.<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment of a Homestead. See Homestead.<\/li>\n<li>Abandonment\u2014Marine Insurance. See Abandonment and Total Loss in Marine Insurance, Historical.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abandon and Abandonment, Historical in Europe  Definition   \t To desert, to forsake. Abandonment is the relinquishment or surrender of rights or property by one person to another. In Hickman v. Link, 116 Mo. 123, and Dodge v. Marden, 7 Oregon 460; State V. Seneca County Bank, 5 Ohio St. 177, [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,167,94,190,49,52],"tags":[189,66,67,158,95],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5866"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}