{"id":6368,"date":"2013-01-13T19:56:21","date_gmt":"2013-01-13T19:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lawin.org\/?p=6368"},"modified":"2013-01-13T19:56:21","modified_gmt":"2013-01-13T19:56:21","slug":"list-of-international-business-law-landmark-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/list-of-international-business-law-landmark-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"List of International Business Law Landmark Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>List of International Business Law Landmark Court Cases in Europe<\/h1>\n<p><em>List of Selected International Business Law Court Decisions, by Subject<\/em><br \/>\n<strong>Introduction to International and Comparative Law Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Legal Status of Eastern Greenland<\/li>\n<li>The Asylum Case<\/li>\n<li>Sei Fjujii v. State<\/li>\n<li>Matimak Trading Co. v. Khalily and D.A.Y. Kids Sportswear Inc.<\/li>\n<li>The Trail Smelter Arbitration<\/li>\n<li>Arab Republic of Syria v. Arab Republic of Egypt<\/li>\n<li>Arab Monetary Fund v. Hashim and Others (No. 3)<\/li>\n<li>Eunomia di Porro &amp; Co. v. Italian Ministry of Public Education<\/li>\n<li>De Sanchez v. Banco Central de Nicaragua<\/li>\n<li>Raulin v. Fischer<\/li>\n<li>Libyan American Oil Company (Liamco) v. Government of the Libyan Arab Republic<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>State Responsibility and International Environmental Regulation Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sandline International Inc. v. Papua New Guinea<\/li>\n<li>Home Missionary Society Case<\/li>\n<li>Flatow v. The Islamic Republic of Iran<\/li>\n<li>Cantero Herrera v. Canevaro &amp; Co.<\/li>\n<li>ACSYNGO v. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain (France), SA<\/li>\n<li>Case Concerning Barcelona Traction, Light, and Power Company, Ltd. (Second Phase)<\/li>\n<li>Chattin v. United Mexican States<\/li>\n<li>The M\/V SAIGA Case (Merits)<\/li>\n<li>Re Letelier and Moffitt<\/li>\n<li>In the Matter of Revere Copper and Brass, Inc. and Overseas Private Investment Corporation<\/li>\n<li>Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: Provisional Measures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Dispute Settlement Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) (Dissenting Opinion)<\/li>\n<li>European Communities\u2014Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment<\/li>\n<li>Japan\u2014Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages<\/li>\n<li>Fedax N.V. v. The Republic of Venezuela<\/li>\n<li>Attorney-General of the Government of Israel v. Eichmann<\/li>\n<li>Bumper Development Corp., Ltd. v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Others (Union of India and Others, Claimants)<\/li>\n<li>Shell v. R.W. Sturge, Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>Abbott v. Republic of South Africa<\/li>\n<li>Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others (Ex Parte Pinochet)<\/li>\n<li>Bank of India v. Gobindram Naraindas Sadhwani and Others<\/li>\n<li>Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company<\/li>\n<li>Airbus Industrie G.I.E v. Patel<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Multinational Companies Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Puerto Rico v. Russell &amp; Co. et al.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Case Concerning Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. (Second Phase)<\/li>\n<li>Metro Industries v. Sammi Corp.<\/li>\n<li>M\u00e9tropole T\u00e9l\u00e9vision (M6) v Commission of the European Communities<\/li>\n<li>Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California, Solano County<\/li>\n<li>United States v. Blondek, Tull, Castle, and Lowry<\/li>\n<li>Touche Ross and Company v. Bank Intercontinental, Limited Case<\/li>\n<li>Garden Contamination Case (No. 2)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Foreign Investment Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Arab Republic of Egypt v. Southern Pacific Properties, Ltd. et al<\/li>\n<li>Brady v. Brown<\/li>\n<li>Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. United States<\/li>\n<li>Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula, SpA<\/li>\n<li>The Bhopal Case<\/li>\n<li>Batchelder v. Kawamoto<\/li>\n<li>United States v. O\u2019Hagan<\/li>\n<li>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Knowles<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International\u00a0Financian Institutions Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover, Inc. et al.<\/li>\n<li>Re Law Authorizing an Increase in the French Quota to the International Monetary Fund<\/li>\n<li>De Boer, Widow Moojen v. Ducro et al.<\/li>\n<li>Wilson, Smithett &amp; Cope, Ltd. v. Terruzzi<\/li>\n<li>Menendez et al. v. Saks and Company et al.<\/li>\n<li>The Banker\u2019s Case<\/li>\n<li>Hunt et al. c. Alliance North American Government Income Trust, Inc. et al.<\/li>\n<li>In re Sealed Case<\/li>\n<li>Vishipco Line et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.<\/li>\n<li>Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v. Bankers Trust Company<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Trade in Goods Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Finance Ministry v. Manifattura Lane Marzotto, SpA<\/li>\n<li>Japan\u2014Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages<\/li>\n<li>United States\u2014Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products<\/li>\n<li>Orbisphere Corp. v. United States<\/li>\n<li>Australia\u2014Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon<\/li>\n<li>Mukand Ltd. v. Council of the European Union<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Services and Labor Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>European Communities\u2014Regime for the Importation, Sale, and Distribution of Bananas<\/li>\n<li>Jany v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie<\/li>\n<li>Duberg v. UNESCO<\/li>\n<li>Doe v. Unocal Corp.<\/li>\n<li>Doe v. Uncocal Corp. (Appellate Decision reversing in part, affirming in part)<\/li>\n<li>State v. Nagami<\/li>\n<li>Republic v. Mussa and Five Others<\/li>\n<li>England and Another v. Attorney-General of St. Lucia<\/li>\n<li>George v. International Air Service Co., Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>Spiess et al. c. C. Itoh &amp; Co. (America), Inc.<\/li>\n<li>Morelli v. Cedel<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Intellectual Property Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Performing Right Society, Limited v. Hickey<\/li>\n<li>Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L\u2019anza Research International, Inc.<\/li>\n<li>Monsanto Co. V. Coramandal Indag Products, (P) Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Hammerton<\/li>\n<li>Consten and Grundig v. Commission Case 9-6. Ransome-Kuti v. Phonogram, Ltd.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Sales Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc.<\/li>\n<li>MCC Marble Ceramic v. Ceramica<\/li>\n<li>United Technologies International, Inc. v. Magyar L\u00e9gi K\u00f6zleked\u00e9si V\u00e1llalat<\/li>\n<li>Filanto, SpA v. Chilewich International Corp.<\/li>\n<li>The Natural Gas Case<\/li>\n<li>The Shoe Seller\u2019s Case<\/li>\n<li>Downs Investments Pty. Ltd. v. Perwaja Steel SDN BHD<\/li>\n<li>Nuova Fucinati, S.p.A. v. Fondmetall International, A.B.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Transportation Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company v. Neuromed Medical Systems &amp; Support, GmbH<\/li>\n<li>Pyrene Co., Ltd. v. Scindia Navigation Co., Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>Phillips Puerto Rico Core, Inc. v. Tradax Petroleum, Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>M. Golodetz &amp; Co., Inc. v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co., Inc. (The Galitia)<\/li>\n<li>Barclays Bank, Ltd. v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise<\/li>\n<li>Great China Metal Industries Co. Ltd. v. Malaysian International Shipping Corp.<\/li>\n<li>Croft &amp; Scully Co. v M\/V Skulptor Vuchetich et al.<\/li>\n<li>The Chinese Seamen\u2019s Foreign Technical Services Co. v. Soto Grande Shipping Corp., SA<\/li>\n<li>Western Assurance Co. of Toronto v. Shaw<\/li>\n<li>Abnett v. British Airways Plc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Financing Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Constantaras v. Anagnostopoulos<\/li>\n<li>Miller v. Race<\/li>\n<li>Mair v. Bank of Nova Scotia<\/li>\n<li>Far East Realty Investment, Inc. v. Court of Appeals et al.<\/li>\n<li>Charles R. Allen, Inc. v. Island Cooperative Services Cooperative Association<\/li>\n<li>Trans Trust Sprl v. Danubian Trading Co., Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>Sztejn v. J. Henry Schroeder Banking Corp.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>International Taxation Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In Re Natural Sweet Wines<\/li>\n<li>Reiss and Company (Nigeria), Ltd. v. Federal Board of Inland Revenue<\/li>\n<li>Cook v. Tait, United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Maryland<\/li>\n<li>Crown Forest Industries Ltd. v. Canada<\/li>\n<li>Bank of the Federated States of Micronesia v. Government of the Federated States of Micronesia<\/li>\n<li>Mobil Oil (Nigeria), Ltd. v. Federal Board of Inland Revenue<\/li>\n<li>Director General of Inland Revenue v. Rothmans of Pall Mall (Malaysia) Bhd.<\/li>\n<li>Johansson v. United States<\/li>\n<li>Barclays Bank, PLC v. Franchise Tax Board of California<\/li>\n<li>Kalo v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>See Also<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Investment Treaty Cases: ICSID arbitration rules R-Z<\/li>\n<li>Investment Treaty Cases: ICSID arbitration rules A-E<\/li>\n<li>Investment Treaty Cases: ICSID arbitration rules F-Q<\/li>\n<li>Investment Treaty Cases: UNCITRAL arbitration rules<\/li>\n<li>Investment Treaty Cases: arbitration rules<\/li>\n<li>Investment Treaty Cases: ICSID Additional Facility arbitration rules<\/li>\n<li>List of main cases in the Encyclopedia<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>List of International Business Law Landmark Court Cases in Europe   List of Selected International Business Law Court Decisions, by Subject  Introduction to International and Comparative Law Cases   \t Legal Status of Eastern Greenland  \t The Asylum Case  \t Sei Fjujii v. State  \t Matimak [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[254,190,10,52],"tags":[274,183,118],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6368"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}