{"id":8466,"date":"2013-04-02T13:21:04","date_gmt":"2013-04-02T13:21:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/legaldictionary.lawin.org?p=8466"},"modified":"2013-04-02T13:21:04","modified_gmt":"2013-04-02T13:21:04","slug":"blandy-v-widmore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/blandy-v-widmore\/","title":{"rendered":"Blandy V. Widmore"},"content":{"rendered":"
((1716), 1 P. Wins. 323). In marriage articles the intended husband covenanted to leave Ins wife 620 if she should survive him. He died intestate, and his wife’s shave, under the Statute of Distributions, exceeded 620. Held, that the wife was not. entitled to have the 620 and her distributive share ; but that the distributive share must be taken as a satisfaction or performance of the covenant<\/p>\n<\/h4>\n
You might be interested in these references tools:<\/p>\n